Overview
873 leaders
Total Score
–
–
2024––
Company NPS
–
–
2024n/anot collected
Self-Rating
–
How leaders rate themselves
2024––
Self-Awareness Gap
–
Others minus self
2024––
NPS Distribution
Self-Awareness Distribution
Hidden Strength gap ≥ +0.25
Aligned −0.25 to +0.25
Blind Spot gap ≤ −0.25
Capability Heatmap
Weakest––Strongest
Grade Comparison
Total score how others rate them
Self-rating how they rate themselves
Competency Ranking
Gate 1
Performance
Rank ≥ 75th percentile
Sits in the top quartile of the company-wide leader population on Total Score, the weighted view across supervisor, direct reports and peers.
–
Gate 2
Advocacy
NPS ≥ +20
Raters would actively recommend this leader. +20 is the Solid tier on the six-band scale, so this is a real endorsement rather than an absence of complaint.
–
Gate 3
Self-Awareness
Gap ≥ −0.35
Their own view of themselves is close to how others see them. Excludes leaders who rate themselves materially above the people who work with them.
–
Gates Cleared
Leaders
| Name | Total | Rank % | NPS | Self-Aware | Gates | 2024 |
|---|
Show
How individual line managers rate the leaders reporting to them, using the supervisor lens only. Computable because the 2025 export carries a real line manager ID on every row. A wide spread means leaders under different managers are being measured against different standards on the supervisor third of their score.
Managers Rating
–
–
Population Mean
–
Average supervisor score given
Spread
–
Harshest to most generous manager
Harshest and Most Generous
Harshest raters
Most generous raters
Mean DR Completion
–
Of invited direct reports who responded
Zero DR Returned
–
Total rests on two rater groups, not three
Below 50% Completion
–
DR lens present but thin
Leaders With No Direct-Report Data
| Name | Grade | Total | Rank % | DR Invited |
|---|
Show